Fundraising Appeals

To love or not to love

By Fiona Paterson

I love working on appeals, particularly the integrated campaigns we run. These appeals utilise digital and the phone alongside traditional direct mail. It gives me a chance to get absorbed by a great story, to remind myself why the charity we are helping exists. It also helps me connect with beneficiaries and remember that there are hundreds and thousands of wonderful Australians and New Zealanders out there who give their hard earned dollars to help others, even when their own financial situations may not be brilliant.

On the flip side sometimes I don’t love working on appeals. Because fundraisers are held to some pretty unrealistic expectations when it comes to their individual campaign outcomes.

For most the need to grow appeal income year-on-year is standard. But what happens when your audience is being asked to do more than just support your appeals? What happens when there is no acquisition to develop the base? What happens when market forces, like the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), threaten our audience’s capacity to give?

The context of an appeal

Christmas 2009 turned out to be a pretty tough one for lots of charities. At the start of 2010 I was in a ‘not loving appeal objectives’ frame of mind as more and more fundraisers began to ask me how had others Christmas appeals faired and set about trying to get a clear picture of the marketplace.

As a strategy director it’s hard for me to just look at individual appeals in isolation. I always want to know what the context is in which they are executed. Has there been much acquisition in the past year? Has the communications program/donor journey changed this year? Were new activities targeted at the audience preceding the appeal? Is a segmentation model used to target the activity? Has one been newly introduced? Was the messaging part of an ongoing, planned communication with donors? Was it an emergency message? And more…

But living in the real world means, as fundraisers, we mostly have to work to individual campaign targets.

I love, love, love, organisations that have the flexibility to look at their programs as whole – judging performance across the year, looking at combined returns across the gamut of activity being directed at the donor audience, but this is not the common practice.

So what happened with Christmas appeals to warm (previous) donors? I had a good dig around in the results of our clients, and spoke with a range of friends in other Charities.

What I found was that there was no one defining trend. A few organisations saw growth over their 2008 Christmas income; others found it harder and were seeing below or on par returns compared to 2008. On the whole however it appears that more appeals struggled than those that didn’t.

How did we do?

Increasing appeal income is not an unreasonable request. And for 2009 many organisations had this goal. In order to grow your appeal income you need to either increase average gift increase number of responses, increase your conversion of new donors to multi givers, increase your donor pool or a combination of these.

Most organisations maintained or grew their response rates. The contributing factors included:

  • (Better) targeting;
  • Focused efforts on high value/top 20 percent of donors;
  • Channel integration (eg using phone and/or email);
  • Utilising additional ‘waves’ of communication (follow up or chaser communications).

Many organisations saw average gifts plateau, and in some cases drop. The contributing factors here were:

  • Depressed high value giving. Just a few high value donors not giving or reducing their giving amounts can have a big impact;
  • Acquisition (in particular lower value cash recruitment). Recruiting more donors, at a lower value will see more lower value gifts, suppressing overall average gift; and
  • Anecdotally donors indicating they simply could not give at their previous levels.

For those not making specific asks to donors and/or using their individual, prior giving levels as the basis for your ask, depression of average gifts may have been even larger.

Across the year I have had feedback from major donor fundraisers that their usual suspects were indicating they were not able to give in 2009 or only able to give at a lower levels than in previous years. This has extended through to cash appeals with high value donors tending to maintain response (with a couple of exceptions) but give less.

Those organisations that focused their efforts on this group reaped the rewards. Strong business cases presented justifying higher value giving, follow up communications and person-to-person asking (via face-to-face and phone) and personalised touches helped to encourage this valued group of donors to continue their support.

Context is so important.

Did you change your program in 2009? Maybe you felt the GFC required a change in tack? Did you increase your focus on regular giving conversion? Maybe you had learnings and insights from 2008 that saw you adjust you communications mix or the way you asked your donors?

An organisation I work with changed their 2009 donor communication program. Through the introduction of new tactics in their Spring appeal they saw a significant increase in income from increased response and average gifts. They also introduced an additional communication before Christmas, the purpose of which was donor care and information gathering but unexpectedly generated significant income (lovely donors). And they have increased their active asking (via phone and mail) of cash donors to convert to regular giving throughout 2009.

When it came to their Christmas appeal, major growth in comparison to their appeal in 2008 the previous year was not generated. On the face of it their 2009 Christmas appeal was deemed unsuccessful. Viewed in isolation this is a reasonable conclusion. However on closer inspection we can see over the course of 2009 many of their donors had:

  • already given more than their previous annual value through increased average gifts and response rates in other appeals;
  • converted to regular giving cash gifts but the value and/or frequency of these gift can reduce)

Also to note was the volume and value of high value gifts had not matched those received in 2008.

Just taking a direct comparison between 2008 and 2009, their Christmas appeal doesn’t look impressive. Looking at 2008 versus 2009 as a whole we can see that growth has been impressive (even without expectations that the GFC had the potential to suppress growth).

In fact, just in the last quarter, nearly twice as many people gave as compared to 2008.

To summarise, what we did observe with the Christmas appeals 2009 were:

1. Response rates were maintained or increased;
2. Average gifts decreased or were static;
3. Fewer people gave over $1,000

Emerging Trends

There are some other emerging trends to watch out for; most are reflective of or are driving, changing donor giving behaviours.

  • More donors who used to only give through the post are now using our websites as a response channel
  • The increasing use of email to support direct mail appeals is helping to improving response
  • Below are three approaches showing encouraging returns:
    - Integrating email, supporting direct mail approaches & driving online to give
    - Using email drivers to reactivate lapsed donors
    - Using email drivers to convert tepid* supporters to cash donors
  • More opportunities/ways to give are being offered to our donors. Many organisations are increasing their approaches for regular giving conversion and upgrades, virtual gift campaigns are on the rise, and advocacy and campaigning approaches are increasing
  • Charities are asking more often

On this last point I often get asked “How many times should I ask my donors for a donation each year?” To quote Jeff Brooks “this is the wrong question – the question should be; How can we be relevant in the lives of our donors?” There is no magic formula. It critical to understand that for many donors it takes more than one ask to solicit a gift but they do not want to be treated like ATMs.

The importance of relevance.

If your Christmas campaign, or any campaign for that matter, did not at least match your 2008 returns (and you haven’t lost a whole pile of your active donor base in some freak database accident) then I recommend you consider the relevance of the communication you sent to your donors.

And consider the stage in the relationship journey each donor is with you. There are many questions you should be asking yourself including key ones such as:

  • Is this donor relatively new and do they know little about the topic?
  • Has this donor heard it all before?
  • How did they respond?
  • Would they be expecting you to communicate with them at this time, about this issues with this ask?

To paraphrase Jeff Brooks in his Future Fundraising blog: ‘You can’t just raise funds for anything you want. If you go to your donors with a need, topic or ask they don’t associate you with, they just might ignore you in droves. No matter how great your work is.’

Tips for keeping your appeals on track

  • Make sure your communications consider your audience and are relevant to them
  • Ensure you are presenting a clear need and solution
  • Connect donors to beneficiaries (not you, your brand or organisations)
  • Tell a story your audience can connect with
  • Plan your second gift conversion journey
  • Focus your efforts on the top 20 percent (its where your income is coming form)
  • Review your online donation real estate (Is it easy to find? Is it easy to fill in? Can it be adapted to reflect your appeal ask?)
  • Explore channel integration (Email, Phone) – if you have low email or phone number penetration make 2010 your year to actively collect these. (Analysis shows us that even the presence of an email address or phone number on a donor record increases their retention likelihood)
  • Segment and target – don’t mass mail

______________________________________________________________________________________________

* Tepid Supporter – non-financial supporters such as activists, campaigners, e-news sign ups and non-cash donors such as event participants, lottery players and merchandise buyers

Jeff Brooks writes the best blog in fundraising, and we look forward to seeing him at the F&P Australasian Fundraising conference later this year click here and subscribe to his excellent, short updates

About Fiona Paterson

Fiona is a Fundraising and Direct Marketing professional with over ten years experience helping to find, keep and grow donors through the expert management of strategic fundraising and database marketing programs. Enthusiastic and passionate about data, Fiona has a solid background delivering successful fundraising programs globally for clients including ChildFund Australia, Children’s Cancer Institute of Australia, MSF Hong Kong, Leprosy Mission New Zealand and WWF-Australia.

A personal fundraiser

By Sean Triner, Co Founder of Pareto Fundraising and Pareto Phone

For my 40th birthday I decided to forego presents, and reduce stress on my friends wondering what to get me. So I decided to fundraise for Women’s health charity – my birthday is on International Women’s Day.

Since I am a fundraiser for a living, I wanted to do this right and also work with a charity who would ring-fence the money raised for fundraising purposes, and follow up the donations with good donor care.

My Plan:

1) Choose a charity
2) Create an EveryDay Hero page
3) Use my blog, Facebook and Twitter to market it
4) Market direct to my personal contacts
5) Thank donations
6) Charity to follow up

Choosing a charity

A while back I had done some work with the Marie Stopes Foundation. A great charity, working in women’s health – especially sexual and reproductive health. I love the work they do and visited a project in Fiji. I also knew my $4,000 target would have a big impact and that it can be a difficult area for fundraising.

Creating an EveryDay Hero page

An easy process. It took about 20 minutes including uploading a couple of photos and it is all self explanatory. There are other fundraising websites like this such as Just Giving in the UK and Artez in North American and Australia.

Not that keen on the fact that there is no space to summarise the appeal, nor the fact that they don’t take AMEX (AMEX holders tend to be more generous – they are good customers and they like to use their AMEX cards. Many people don’t accept them because of higher charges – this is bad donor care. I didn’t realise until too late or I would have used another provider).

Check out the page here. Fundraisers need to remember that EveryDay Hero is the mechanism for donating. It will raise $0 if it is not marketed properly.

Posting on social media

I put up a simple blog, then a better one when I got a case-study. Also Twittered about it and put on Facebook.

The simple blog got in $220 within a couple of days, then nothing.

The more advanced blog has just gone up.

Direct Marketing

Over 95% of the income was generated through email and phone calls. I remembered my old events fundraising days, and that with sponsor forms it is really important to get the top contributors first.

So I went approached the people that I thought would donate a higher level ie over $100. These were people close to me, and earners. Nine have given so far averaging $152 each.

After that I sent emails to about twenty other friends and fundraising gurus.

When a decent average, and high ‘spread’ of donations were on the form to act as prompts, I then emailed all Pareto staff (60 emails – mail merged and emailed separately with slightly different version for senior managers).It is worth learning how to mail-merge to email rather than putting everyone in the To: box, or emailing yourself and putting them in the BCC: box.

Thanking

An automated thank you goes from EveryDay Hero, but in addition I recommend that you drop people a personal note as well, when the notification comes in.

Charity to follow up

Donors can choose whether the charity is notified of their details. If they supplied them, they would have wondered about what happens next. What should happen next is the charity also thank.

Donors should be thanked by the charity as their donations come in.

Also, just before the end of the campaign they should thank again – updating the donor on where we are up to with the campaign, telling them another story and asking if they would encourage friends to donate. In my case, around 1 March would be ideal.

Immediately after the campaign – in my case around the 9 March – another email should go to donors thanking them, telling them the result of the campaign, asking donors to sign up to a regular gift. You should ask for between 20% and 30% per month of whatever they donated. So a $250 donor should be asked for between $50 and $75 per month.

Next

Don’t forget the donors and the fundraiser. Ask the fundraiser themselves to become a regular monthly donor and make sure you stay in touch with the donors.

Finally

Visit this site, have a look around and please make a donation.

© Pareto Fundraising

Call that a crisis? This is a crisis.

By Sean Triner

“Good luck in reaching your target. Having just given birth to a beautiful daughter who is happy and healthy, I thank my lucky stars all the time. Kindest and warmest thanks for all the work you do.” A donor responding to the Starlight Children’s Foundation crisis appeal.

Starlight, the Australian children’s charity which helps thousands of kids in hospitals around the country was in suffering from the negative impact of the economic downturn.

Attractive to families of kids in hospitals and a great brand for corporate sponsors to associate themselves with, Starlight’s event and corporate fundraising staff had helped grow the charity for 21 years.

But when the Australian economy began to wobble, these were the first fundraising ‘products’ to falter. At the same time, Starlight had stretched itself to try and reach more kids, more effectively – but something had to give.

“Over the past 10 years, Starlight has grown extraordinarily and much of our income growth has come from corporate support, community fundraising and events” Jill Weekes CEO explained “we have grown our services at the same rate as our income and these income streams were immediately impacted by the economic downturn. Whilst we had recognised for some time we would need to grow our ‘individual giving’ income, this downturn has meant the imbalance in our income streams needs to be addressed urgently and we have had to review our fundraising structure and strategy to achieve this as a key priority for the entire organisation.”

Starlight went into crisis aversion mode – if they were to survive, they had to cut costs and cut costs fast. And that meant people; people delivering services.

Because of sharp warning systems and a board and management willingness to act fast, Starlight will survive. And the lessons learned will help grow a fitter, healthier organisation better placed to deliver services in the next decade.

A few years ago, the management and board knew they had to diversify fundraising sources – they had seen the growth of other charities through individual fundraising. At first put off by the sheer cost of building individual fundraising, a series of tests by fundraiser Caroline Rowland proved the value of this area of investment.

But they were in a classic chicken and egg charity catch-22. To become a secure, solid charity with a more diversified, solid fundraising portfolio they would need to invest in individual fundraising, especially donor care and regular (monthly automatic) giving.

Head of Partnerships, Anne Johnston was keen to continue the development work. Along with the board and management, they decided to take the challenge head on with complete transparency.

To alleviate rumour, and show full respect to their beneficiaries, staff and donors they went public with their woes and put in place a plan to shift their fundraising along a gear or two; but they couldn’t avoid redundancies. A press and fundraising campaign was launched in April 2009.

It was at this point that they approached Pareto Fundraising – initially to look at long term donor development. But the press were responding really well to the story, and whilst their plight was high in the news they decided to take a gamble and change their usual approach immediately.

With about 40,000 people who had supported Starlight in the past few years, Pareto Fundraising advised that they go out with a direct appeal to them for help. An appeal was put together in record time to take advantage of the media. The approach was incredibly simple.

The CEO, Jill Weekes, agreed to bare all in public. A strong, honest, incredibly personal and direct letter was sent. In support of the letter were incredibly simple pieces all thrown together in Microsoft Word.

We pulled headlines from newspapers and stuck them on a piece of paper, photocopied it and had one piece. Another consisted of very simple overviews of four of the services affected by the cuts and finally, a copy of Jill’s statement about the cuts (which she had published on the web). An emergency reply envelope was also produced.

Targeting showed that two waves (i.e. mail twice) to fewer donors would probably make more money in the short term but the crisis was seen as an opportunity to reactivate lapsed donors and test out groups of supporters who wouldn’t ordinarily give to mail appeals. Even in the midst of a crisis, Starlight fundraiser Caroline had her eye on the long term.

However, the targeting identified 285 very high value donors who would get the special treatment. They got the appeal sent in an Express Post envelope – always a nice surprise for people, Express Post costs close to fifteen times as much as normal charity mail but we figured these people were worth it.

Starlight staff also committed to calling as many of them as they could with a highly personalised phone call, asking them about the appeal and reminding them to donate. Unfortunately illness and other reasons caused a delay on some of those calls but an impressive 75 donors had engaging conversations and all were supportive.

“While of course it’s difficult to get hold of people, those donors I spoke to were generally happy to hear from me as I first thanked them for being such wonderful supporters. Most donors I spoke to indicated they would make a donation.” noted Anne Johnston, Head of Partnerships.

The next few thousand received the mailing in a larger envelope and all the others in standard charity mail envelopes.

There were nowhere near enough email addresses for email to figure within the campaign strategy but we did put the appeal up online with prompts to it from the home page. More of a branding issue than a fundraiser. We felt that writing to people with such a strong campaign, and then not mentioning it on the homepage was disingenuous.

We also knew we were shooting from the hip – reacting fast to an opportunity without having put the strategy to bed. But after drafting the letter and reading it out loud we all knew whatever the medium and long term strategy, this was the right thing to do right now.

Through clever cash management and planning, Starlight managed to find more budget to mail a second wave too. That additional investment will help end the debate on net v return on investment (ROI) for Starlight. Whatever the ROI, the additional net income was what Starlight needed.

When the mailing went out, all were nervous. It went out really, really fast. There was no Johnson box (a bit of extra copy, like a teaser, above the salutation) and the use of bolding and underlining was minimal. We wanted it to look rushed, but still wanted it to perform. Which worked well, because it was rushed and we did want it to perform!

”There was a lot to do and too little time to do it all in – between pulling together the most relevant donor lists, finalising the letter and lift pieces - which had to be approved at board level due to the ‘bare it all’ approach, briefing everyone in the organisation and all our key supporters, it was a frantic time. But we knew this was absolutely the right thing to do and were so motivated by the chance to raise funds that would help save our services for seriously ill children and their families” Caroline Rowland, Starlight Relationship Fundraising Manager explained.

Pulling it together so quick also had implications for project management; the Starlight team were already stretched coping with the impact of the downturn to the organisation overall and Pareto Fundraising was at capacity with ‘booked in’ tax appeals for other charities. The team of strangers was pulled together with little notice and thrown together with no induction or time to get to know each other.

Everyone in the team was nervous. Pareto Fundraising had experience of crisis mailings – but never before with something so upfront and honest in a global financial crisis. Tests abroad had shown that mentioning the financial crisis could even harm appeal mailings.

For context, we had the element of last year’s tax appeal that was sent to warm donors. With limited acquisition since then, the number of ‘hot’ donors Starlight had available to mail was dwindling but we needed to do better. Last year the warm appeal raised $320,000 – a tax appeal record for Starlight. This time we wanted $500,000 – over 50% more, in the midst of a global financial crisis.

“For Starlight the Crisis Appeal was a turning point, the immediate team were convinced we needed to do this and that the result would change our fundraising structure forever. We were delighted to be working with Pareto Fundraising and their confidence inspired ours – but it was a risk, we had to convince the board, the internal management team and our core supporters. We were relative newcomers to the arena of personalised direct marketing and had no illusions about this; would we get the response rates and income we hoped for? We didn’t know, but we knew we had to try”. Anne Johnston, Head of Partnerships comments.

As soon as wave I landed a flood gate opened. Thousands of dollars rolled in, and the first week had everyone smiling and optimistic. But quickly it dropped off to normal levels. The deadline for donations was 25 May, about two weeks after mailing, and by deadline we had broken all records; but income was $370,000 – still short of target.

Not bad, but not that exciting neither – and not enough to begin to bankroll Starlight’s investment in a more secure future.

But bizarrely, the weekly income just didn’t drop off.

In fact, it kept coming in so long I delayed this article.

To date Starlight has raised $650,776. That is 105% more than last year. The first wave alone raised $515,000.

Of the 285 top donors, 20% (58) donated an average of nearly $2,000. With 3,800 people donating (nearly 10% online) Starlight managed to begin a warchest for future fundraising, reactivate hundreds of donors and engage with nearly 75 major donors. Most donors gave more than they ever had before.

The strategy is now in place, and the major donors will be approached one on one to say thank you, and further engage with face to face major donor asks. Other donors are being approached to become regular givers – we telephone, thank and ask for ongoing monthly gifts from bank accounts and credit cards.

“We kept the whole organisation and our board informed of progress throughout the appeal, when we hit the $500,000 target it was just the most amazing vote of confidence for everyone – people working in a charity care about the work they do emotionally as well as professionally – so you can imagine the difference this extraordinary success made to our team’s morale – now we could focus on how we rebuild for the future.” Anne Johnston explains.

A sterling team effort from fundraisers, board and management at Starlight made all of this possible. I have seem so many project ideas like this come a cropper because of individuals’ pride or fear that donors will somehow blame them. In this instance, from Chair and CEO downwards, their courage was rewarded out with a swelling of the cash that is allowing Starlight to invest in the kind of fundraising that will make another crisis so much more unlikely.

All well and good, but having read this far, you want to see the letter don’t you?

Click here where you can read and download wave I full pack and the wave II letter.

The twelve pages / elements of wave I are where the hard work was done, but of course we can improve on it. But check out the wave II letter as well – a great tip for producing an incredibly cheap and effective follow on. The wave II letter was accompanied by the same materials as wave I except we didn’t send the newspaper cuttings again.

Classic, direct mail still rocks in the twenty-first century.

“I sincerely hope this heart warming foundation can continue to shine light into the dark and frightening world inhabited by ill children. I am happy to do what I can.” A donor responding to the Starlight crisis appeal.

Starlight Crisis Appeal Team

Caroline Rowland, Relationship Fundraising Manager – individual giving project manager at Starlight
Sarah Young, Collateral and Website Marketing Manager – web marketing and project assistant at Starlight
Naomi Byers, Account Manager – project manager (wave I) at Pareto
Justine Mathieson, PA to director at Pareto Fundraising – crash course in old fashioned cut and paste (with scissors and glue) graphic designer
Sharon Tillman, Account Manager - project manager (wave II) at Pareto
Andy Tidy, Senior Data Analyst – data guru at Pareto Fundraising
Anne Johnston, Head of Partnerships – bore the responsibility for budget, signoff and the whole gamble at Starlight
Fiona Paterson, senior consultant – Pareto Fundraising consultant, peer support for strategy and proposals
Ian Kennedy, the father of Australian Direct Marketing – Starlight Board Member champion who encouraged us all to ‘just go for it’
Sean Triner, Director – strategy and copywriter

About the writer

Sean Triner is co-founder and director of the international Pareto Groups of companies, one of Australia’s most dynamic fundraising and marketing agencies with offices in Australia, New Zealand, North America and Hong Kong. Never afraid to cause controversy, Sean is a popular presenter at some of the world’s best known conferences including IFC in Amsterdam, FIA, IWRM and DMAW. He also regularily contributes to fundraising publications globally.

25 Steps to Great Customer Care

1. Ensure all frontline staff (including receptionists) are fully trained to take inbound calls and handle enquiries (including setting up regular gifts and handling donations)

2. Ensure that frontline staff know about programs in advance – they must know what to expect and they have information for frequently asked questions (faq) sheets.

3. Set service level agreements (SLAs) for response handling and ensure all staff are aware of these i.e. All mail received must be responded to within five working days

4. Set up an automatically generated email for general/donation enquires indicating to supporter how long it may take to get a specific answer

5. If offering regular giving (automatic debits from credit card or bank account – hereafter referred to as RG), ensure all staff are aware of the focus on RG and promote this consistently to all potential supporters – but not at the same time as single donations- see point 6…

6. When sending communication pieces to potential supporters, don’t confuse them with mixed messages, actively promote one way to support (i.e. RG) - not multiple methods to support.

7. Ensure all staff handling supporter calls/queries confirm supporter details, including email and date of birth before ending call (reduce error and supporter dissatisfaction).

8. Ensure all communications (mail, phone, email, Facebook etc) with supporters/potential supporters include the words ‘thank you’ at least once regardless of the nature of the communication, even if it is just acknowledging someone’s interest in the charity

9. If you are experiencing delays with processing, be honest and tell supporters to expect a delay with their receipt/confirmation letter – an example can be found here http://seantriner.blogspot.com/2009/07/fantastic-donor-care.html

10. Where possible, respond to supporter queries in the same way. For example, if a supporter emails your organisation, try and respond by email (unless this is not possible). But when writing proactively (e.g. an appeal) don’t feel restricted with your comms method.

11. Avoid multiple transfers on the phone. Ensure you get the transfer right the first time, not the fourth time.

12. Make sure your staff are aware of current charitable projects. It’s great to have some real life success stories to share with potential donors. Casual anecdotes over the phone mean a warm and memorable experience for the donor.

13. Make the beneficiaries, not your organization, the focus on all communications. Tell supporters how their donation, no matter how small, is going to change the life of your beneficiaries, improve the environment etc.

14. When dealing with bequest enquiries, make sure you promote residuary bequests (percentage of estate, not specified amounts) above all else.

15. Don’t tiptoe around the subject of bequests – tell people why you need the money for your cause, how the funds will be used, and make that ask Emotive case studies always work well for bequests, be it by phone, mail or email.

16. Never ignore an enquiry, no matter how busy you are and how unimportant it seems at the time. Every communication is an opportunity to acquire a new donor for life (and beyond).

17. Be flexible in your approach. Just because your hours are 9 to 5, don’t fob someone off at 5.03pm. They will remember that more than any appeal you ever send them.

18. If things go wrong, make sure you take steps to rectify the situation and then make doubly sure such things can never happen again. Humans make mistakes once, but shoddy customer service means the same mistakes happen again.

19. Get the right staff. If you have a miserable volunteer, make sure they are stuffing envelopes and not answering the phone. Each person who speaks to your donors is an ambassador for not only your charity, but for your beneficiaries. Don’t miss out on additional funds just because you are short-staffed.

20. Find out about your donors. When you get them on the phone, talk to them like a friend. What do they like about your charity? What’s their motivation for leaving a bequest? You’d be amazed at the loyalty you get just from being interested.

21. If you send out a standard letter, handwrite a note or pop a post-it on top. “You’re doing an amazing thing”, “People like you mean the world to us” – something out of the ordinary. Be warm and memorable in all your communications.

22. Follow up, follow up, follow up! If someone asks about leaving you money in their will, call them in a month and ask if they’ve done so. It might mean the difference between a large bequest and a supporter just never getting round to it.

23. Give one senior person ultimate responsibility of the Customer Service function. Make it a top priority. Measure it, report on it, improve it.

24. Ask for what you need, politely but clearly.

25. Say thank you even more.

© Pareto Fundraising